Dona Cadman, Feb. 2008. “In an interview with CTV News yesterday, Dona Cadman stood by her story, outlined in the book, that the Tory officials had met with her husband to woo his vote. ‘Two gentlemen had visited him, offered him a million-dollar life insurance policy and a few other things,’ said Cadman, who is the Conservative candidate in the Surrey North riding once held by her husband. Asked whether she considered it a bribe, she responded, ‘Yes, in a way.'”
Tag Archives: tom zytaruk
Joltin’ Joe
From the Hill Times.
“Distasteful”. Yeah, that seems to sum it up.
Courtesy of the Hill Times, we now know what Tom Zytaruk thinks about the is-it-or-isn’t-it-a-gag-order settlement agreement that ended the Prime Minister’s lawsuit against the Liberal Party:
Tom Zytaruk takes James Moore on an uncomfortable trip down memory lane …
.. in today’s edition of Surrey Now:
Judge Pierre (III)
The NDP’s Joe Comartin raised the matter of the Cadman tape in QP today, focusing his efforts on Pierre Poilievre’s privileged statement of a day ago.
Judge Pierre (II)
After QP today, Liberal house leader Ralph Goodale was asked to comment on Pierre Poilievre’s assertion, repeated in the House this morning, about the veracity of the Cadman tape.
Judge Pierre
From this afternoon’s Question Period.
The Tale of the Tape: Now what?
It will come as no surprise to ITQ readers that we concur entirely with Colleague Wells that Tom Zytaruk deserves a full public apology, and the sooner the better. We also find ourselves nodding in enthusiastic agreement with the words of Former Colleague Radwanski over at the Globe and Mail, who points out that the lawsuit that the Prime Minister filed against the Liberals, and the resulting libel chill, led the rest of us to “let it slide” — with the end result that, more than a year after the allegations first surfaced, we’re no closer to knowing what actually went down during that chaotic week in May 2005.
Man up
Tom Zytaruk on the demise of the Prime Minister’s lawsuit.
ITQDayOffWatch: Last post before I flee, I promise …
Calling all law-talking guys (and girls) – actual, amateur and armchair alike: