Harris-Decima checks in with the electorate.
Tag Archives: Harris-Decima
The Turmel referendum
Respondents to a Harris/Decima survey seem mostly unmoved by Nycole Turmel’s Bloc Quebecois membership.
Everything you know is of questionable accuracy
In a pair of stories, Joan Bryden effectively questions the basis for 85% of political discussion in popular media.
We remain torn over hypothetical options
When Nanos polled a thousand Canadians in January 2009 about what should happen if that year’s federal budget was defeated, 49% favoured an election, 42% said the opposition should be invited to form a coalition.
Harris Decima/CP: … Then again, maybe not.
Slightly less blue-rose-coloured numbers from Harris Decima, which polled from October 1 to 12 — and wouldn’t you like to see those day-by-day breakdowns? — with a 2.2 margin of error:
UPDATED: Oh, Canadians. Why must you confound conventional wisdom like this?
Nearly half of Canadians support the idea of a coalition government
UPDATED: Why must you torture ITQ like this, Canadian Press/Harris-Decima?
Hey, look — a hypertopical public opinion poll on employment insurance reform, courtesy of CP/Harris Decima:
Hunkering Down (35/26/18/9/10)
Dig in:
Harris Decima Cliffhanger Thread (TBA)
Okay, I can’t seem to find the latest from Harris Decima, and I have to run out the door – so I’m going to deputize y’all in the comments to post the numbers – and the URL, if it’s not on the main site – and I’ll update this post when I get to my next destination. (That sounds so glamourous, but it’s really just the Hot Room.)
Conservatives:
Hardly Decimated: (32/27/19/12/8)
Sneak peek at today’s offering from Harris Decima, which has something for everyone to dismiss as unreliable, inconsistent and the result of a rogue poll. Except for BlocWatchers, since my dealer didn’t have that number. I’ll update with a link to the full data as soon as it goes up, but this will tide us over for now:
Conservatives: 32 (+1)